The focus of today was a tool for learning maths. It appears that it is quite a common tool but very under used. Actually Cuisenaire rods are really useful and perfect for this number programme. They should have been used in all sessions. Or perhaps a whole programme on activities with them.
There was a good range of activities in the session. We started by looking at number art and talked a little about pixellated images. We created badges for those who didn't have them yet.
Cuisenaire rods were introduced and I initially got them to figure out which numbers they were, which they all did easily.
We moved on to the colouring by numbers activity (with the numbers expressed by cuisenaire rod size. It worked well to get explorers to think more about the sizes. In most cases they used the rods to check the size of the space. I got around to speak to a few about other ways they could find out which size it would be but not all. I imagine that it would be a natural enough transition to finding and using the grid to detect sizes. Anyway they were asked to finish off at home and so there they would have to use other methods.
The hidden numbers stayed hidden quite well. They were found eventually and I think that those who found them enjoyed the discovery and hopefully it whet their appetite for more exploration (but just a hope).
We had time to look at the investigation. I sold it much better in the second session. I explained that we had to build walls. The restriction was that in a wall, each layer had to be unique. we looked at the examples for 1, 2 and 3 and then I tasked them to look at other widths. In the first group they worked well on the activity but no one bought into it. They found a few rows but I no one really thought about how high it could be or if they had exhausted all the possible rows etc. I should have emphasised this by focussing on the number of rows for 4 or somehow made a game that made it worth doing. Maybe come up with a reason why the walls needed distinct rows.
In the second session, I introduced the activity more successfully but still had little buy in until I got Joe to predict the number of rows for 4.
Me: How many rows will there be in the 4th wall?
Joe: 5 (little commitment)
Me: Why?
Joe: One more than in the third.
Me: How many in the first row?
Joe: 1
Me: and the second?
Joe: 2
Me: and the third?
Joe: 4... Oh it's multiplication
Me so how many in the 4th?
Joe: There will be 8.
Me: Ok. Try to find them all
He was invested in it after that and found 7 rows. Jaz worked well on it also but did her work more neatly so didn't get so far with the investigative part. I wanted them to work in teams but that didn't happen. They all did their own things.
Here are some of the issues with this investigation or at least the running of it in this session.
1) Getting kids to stop playing. ideally all the session would be play but in order to up the challenge I need to stop the play and have a way to do that so that kids know what's coming. I have delayed on the organisation of features of this the whole project. I've started making some progress in terms of forms and support for the organisation but not much actually in session with routines or anything like that. This will need to become a priority. I feel like that episode with Joe was a bit of a breakthrough and the idea of challenge level could be a way to deal with this.
2) Understanding the different levels of challenge. To begin with, it will be understood as a task. One I've asked them to do. Finding the way to get them to see it as a challenge is the key to these sessions. It is an individual thing to a degree but also the impact I'm looking to have and what I should be tracking. An explorer's ability to find the challenge in a task.
3)Generalising any patterns found. This is of the real goal but I can't say I'm very clear about how or if this is something that they have any experience of or anything I can link it to. Finding a general pattern for something that they would understand would be great and needs to be dealt with.
We ended up building a tower with rods. The first group got on with it quite well as a trio. The second group struggled with the idea of working together but really got on well with it in the end and produced a very high tower once they worked as a team.
I didn't get around to bringing up the project which was a shame but Ndg and C20 did some great work on it. More evaluation of that to follow.
I'll have to review the whole summer programme at some point.
There was a good range of activities in the session. We started by looking at number art and talked a little about pixellated images. We created badges for those who didn't have them yet.
Cuisenaire rods were introduced and I initially got them to figure out which numbers they were, which they all did easily.
We moved on to the colouring by numbers activity (with the numbers expressed by cuisenaire rod size. It worked well to get explorers to think more about the sizes. In most cases they used the rods to check the size of the space. I got around to speak to a few about other ways they could find out which size it would be but not all. I imagine that it would be a natural enough transition to finding and using the grid to detect sizes. Anyway they were asked to finish off at home and so there they would have to use other methods.The hidden numbers stayed hidden quite well. They were found eventually and I think that those who found them enjoyed the discovery and hopefully it whet their appetite for more exploration (but just a hope).
We had time to look at the investigation. I sold it much better in the second session. I explained that we had to build walls. The restriction was that in a wall, each layer had to be unique. we looked at the examples for 1, 2 and 3 and then I tasked them to look at other widths. In the first group they worked well on the activity but no one bought into it. They found a few rows but I no one really thought about how high it could be or if they had exhausted all the possible rows etc. I should have emphasised this by focussing on the number of rows for 4 or somehow made a game that made it worth doing. Maybe come up with a reason why the walls needed distinct rows.
In the second session, I introduced the activity more successfully but still had little buy in until I got Joe to predict the number of rows for 4.Me: How many rows will there be in the 4th wall?
Joe: 5 (little commitment)
Me: Why?
Joe: One more than in the third.
Me: How many in the first row?
Joe: 1
Me: and the second?
Joe: 2
Me: and the third?
Joe: 4... Oh it's multiplication
Me so how many in the 4th?
Joe: There will be 8.
Me: Ok. Try to find them all
He was invested in it after that and found 7 rows. Jaz worked well on it also but did her work more neatly so didn't get so far with the investigative part. I wanted them to work in teams but that didn't happen. They all did their own things.
Here are some of the issues with this investigation or at least the running of it in this session.
![]() |
| General chaos of a session |
2) Understanding the different levels of challenge. To begin with, it will be understood as a task. One I've asked them to do. Finding the way to get them to see it as a challenge is the key to these sessions. It is an individual thing to a degree but also the impact I'm looking to have and what I should be tracking. An explorer's ability to find the challenge in a task.
3)Generalising any patterns found. This is of the real goal but I can't say I'm very clear about how or if this is something that they have any experience of or anything I can link it to. Finding a general pattern for something that they would understand would be great and needs to be dealt with.
We ended up building a tower with rods. The first group got on with it quite well as a trio. The second group struggled with the idea of working together but really got on well with it in the end and produced a very high tower once they worked as a team.I didn't get around to bringing up the project which was a shame but Ndg and C20 did some great work on it. More evaluation of that to follow.
I'll have to review the whole summer programme at some point.










Second thing (finally) I need to sell activities. The king and prince 




































